jaeground.blogg.se

1. CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART HOW TO
2. CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART SOFTWARE
3. CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART WINDOWS

Shaping any part in vision which has any radius or complication will be a test of your mental stability as well as they are extremely difficult to modify and don't even think about changing the part sizes after they have been shaped as what you end up with may not even remotely resemble what you started with. Some may argue about shaping doors in vision but since it cannot actually produce the parts and they are only graphical I say it really makes no difference.

CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART WINDOWS

No continuity within the program and nothing which would be considered to be standard windows operating system, There is absolutely nothing that can be done in vision that cannot be done better in ware.

There is not even a standard as to how anything works as if every part was designed by a different programmer from different generations. The menus are non intuitive and seem to be based on a 1980's spreadsheet with tabs rather than a modern easily navigated format with drop down menus. It is completely inefficient and slow as a result. After every click the program has to completely regenerate the drawing and you have to wait before you can make your next move. Imagine driving behind someone who hits the gas then the brakes then the gas then the brakes then slams on the brakes in the middle of the freeway for no reason or just crashes and causes you to lose all of your recent work. Planit/Vero made a huge mistake killing Cabnetware.Ĭabinet vision is SLOW, SLOW SLOW AGRAVATING AND SLOW. Not everybody can do that, and that's ok.Ģ/23/17 #14: cabnetware vs.

CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART SOFTWARE

You need to chuck CW out the window and just commit to CV, even when it slows you down getting something set up just right that you could have done in your sleep in the software you've been using for years. If you're just going to approach CV as a "better" CW, then you're going to hate it and your implementation will fail and you might as well not even try. While that might be true for them personally because they are unable to learn the new technologies, that isn't true in general. This is no different from the people who refused to learn automated tools for woodworking because they were faster with whatever it was they used to have. You can also outsource those components you don't want to learn- you can outsource setup, you can outsource programming, you can outsource reports. It has a complete solid model with the ability to project operations from one part to another, but if you need to make changes from what it ships with you will need to learn about solid modelling.

CABINET VISION PARAMETER TO REMOVE A PART HOW TO

It has a comprehensive reporting capability using Crystal Reports, but if you need something other than what it ships with you will need to know how to use Crystal Reports. It has a programming language in it that can be used to do just about anything automatically if you need something other than what it ships with, but to use a programming language you need to know or learn how to program. If you want to use CV, you're going to need people who understand the software. I am probably one of the biggest proponents of using CV, but not if you aren't technical enough.ĬW is 1980's technology, and good for people who are not good with computers. Perhaps you'll draw the things in CW that deserve to be in CW and those things in CV that need to be there. So you have to decide, do you care about the real CAD tools, real solid modelling, real shaped cabinet handling? Or is CW's stuff more important to your business. Unless you remove the old system, people will just continue to use it. This same philosophy is basically true of any software switch, whether engineering, CAD, accounting, ERP, whatever.

Otherwise, everyone will always just revert to what they know. The only way you'll ever actually get switched is for someone in charge to put their foot down and threaten to fire anybody who doesn't switch over.

Human natures says that when you are under the gun, you'll do things the way you already know.

When I occasionally have to open CW to look at something one of them done, it is frustrating because I no longer remember where everything is nor the architecture of the program. We were a CW shop since 1986 (I'm told), and we have several employees who continue to use CW even though it causes massive problems due to its serious limitations. ĬW is easier for you because you're used to it.